by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .442443444445446447448. . .516517»

"Would you like something to drink?" She opened the fridge. "We have water, milk, juice, spiders, Dr. Pepper-"

"Spiders?"

"Spiders it is then."

"No that wasn't-"

But she was already pouring him a brimming glass of spiders.

(The following is a joke, don't do this)

My chimpanzee brain making a comedy skit out of this:

Delicious extra protein, good for muscles after a hard workout! Now you can defeat your crippling fear of bugs by eating...well I guess...drinking the bugs? YEAH! Impress all your friends by seeing how fast it takes to chug an entire glass of spiders! See who out of your friend group is the most manly! You can sell glasses of spiders during the summer, even more refreshing than lemonade, it's fun for the whole family! Now for every bottle of spiders you buy we'll add a second one free for a limited time offer. Supply is limited so call now or look for the brand on the store shelves, Spider Cola™ and have a refreshing drink for all occasions! Relaxing while reading a book, family reunions, weddings or even your arachnophobic aunt's birthday party! Spider Cola™ is now being offered in eight different flavours! There's mint, pineapple, cherry, chocolate, barbeque sauce, lemon, extra crispy, and the classic flavour, plain old spiders! No matter where you are or what you're doing it's always a time for Spider Cola™! Now featuring our newest production, centipede trail mix!

Out of Character: I have entomophobia (fear of bugs), I know it's an irrational fear but my body just won't let me approach a bug. It's a battle in my mind every time I see a bug not to just have a panic attack and freak out. Honestly if you go to therapy for that you're better off than me so good on you. I feel bad for even making the joke about the "arachnophobic aunt" because if anything that's something I can understand too well.

I don't think this whole LARP government takeover of this place is doing anyone any good honestly as we can see it has only brought division and the first time the new rules (which if enforced correctly I would 100% approve of) where enforced they where used wrongly and in a biased way that caused harm to not only an individual but the community as a whole.
This is the kind of worldly stuff Christians are against and fight against with their lives.

Was it Jesus or the Pharisees that censored people? Was it Jesus or the Pharisees that followed man made rules?

With that said I also would like all who left to return or at least construct an embassy. Oire Saint Constable Quebec le beau

Jesus is Lord.

United hispaniola, Attike, and Prudentias

Abortion is death. Disturbed that many people on NationStates have no issue with it. The WA resolution caught my eye precisely because abortion is perhaps one of the most pressing issues, it damages our spiritual well-being, it is the murder of an innocent, and it is the symbol of the ills of modern societies where childlessness is celebrated.

Omensa, Kaiserlichen, United hispaniola, Fredgast, and 3 othersAttike, Cristero, and Prudentias

I voted against that resolution because it repealed the previous one with the wrong reasoning. What I think is really happening is that they are rolling back how extreme the WA's abortion policy is since they must feel like the period of punishment towards United Massachusetts after the quorum raiding incident has come to a close.

Fredgast

Les Versailles wrote:Abortion is death. Disturbed that many people on NationStates have no issue with it. The WA resolution caught my eye precisely because abortion is perhaps one of the most pressing issues, it damages our spiritual well-being, it is the murder of an innocent, and it is the symbol of the ills of modern societies where childlessness is celebrated.

Most people don't talk about it unless they are pro-abortion because they don't want to good bad to others and harm other sensibilities. They only have freedom of expression in their bubbles of people thinking the same thing where where will have power for nothing to change it.

It happened on this community, a post supressed for fear of merely appear looking polemic.

Childlessness and abortion is in fact a rational choice if you take the perspective of the indivifual, and by rational I don't say that it's not totally dysfunctional at all.

1. Children became expensive, even in countries that PAY you to have children due to low fertility rates, extremely few people have economic conditions to have a baby, maybe before you have the choice to try it on poverty but if you do now the government will bully you.

2. Western societies have a decadent ethos that made children a bad thing: Westerners are on full hedonism, why to have children if you may live well in parties, if you may have more time to get better positions at your job and academic  degrees? Children take your time, it mades a lot of noise and don't have any power.

3. It's a society with contraception and oversexualized: Sex is meant for pleasure and reproduction, with contraceptive and multiple partners the second part is eliminated for the over-indulgence of the first, with no peril of getting pregnant by accident.

4. Plannet parenthood: I once get a girlfriend pregnant, I was on dispair, I ask an older friend, that this was not planned at all, he just answered.

- Life just happens.

So I understand, natural pregnancy is the rule, most of the pregnancy on history were never ever planned at all. With technology to plan when to get children, people have no baby at all. About the pregnancy, a miscarriage happened, it was a girl, her name would be Athena.

5. Women's "rights" (and now the fear of being polemic and getting suppressed again): When Western Societies put woman to work, it was to compensate the males that go to war, after the governments discovered that by putting woman on work they may double tax incomes, this give to woman the oportunity of having a life climbing the professional ladder and put the option to have children later, or to don't have children at all.
When most woman that delayed or initially choose to don't have children choose to have it, they were already with fertility decaying, in UK a lot of almost 40 woman protest against their local governments refusing to give fertility rating. They spent so much time on a pleasure carrousel or just working so much on the career that they discovered that it's so late. Man don't help it either, but man fertility take so much more time to end, a man on his 50's may have a children, in fact I saw accidental pregnancy with man over 70's.

6. Man having children is dangerous: Considering that divorce is commonplace (in fact not anymore  because marriage is not commonplace), man fear having kids. As a lawyer I deal with this problem on both times a lot of times. Some woman use the children to make blackmail, if you don't pay the monthly money you can't see thr children, they poison the kid against their fathers and spend the money that was to be directed to the children on futile things, the man go to prison or may lose all he have if he don't pay her. Sometimes the woman just choose the worst time for the man to see the children or when it's the designated time she disappear with the kid or come up later "I was with the children on park, I'm really sorry...". In the end the father only pay monthly tuition for the children that he never see and that another man may end up loved by them as the father role, because the woman poisoned the children against them. On a judgement in 90% of the judgements the woman alone have the power over children, that's why generally I propose the children one week on the house of the mother and one week in the house of the father, but the woman always get the money and may blackmail, always, they have being so much empowered, turning irrational to have children for man at all.

7. There is no religious values in the West anymore.

Western societies may have mostly Christian minds but have an atheist ethos. People may even believe in God but the fact is that we live as if He don't exists, all of us. Most of us certainly made sex before marriage and for pleasure only, and with condoms, I'm putting me in here despite last years I discovered that maybe I'm a bit asexual but would make sex for reproductive reasons only, I have more pleasure with my mind than with orgasm. There is no true religious compromise, most people even among believers find weird don't have sex before marriage, in fact they find even marriage weirds, they made love unions, the excuse for this in Law Theory is that families are made to be "eudaimonic", to make you happy, that is why poliamory is becoming probably the rule in the West next decade. The family is not made to make you happy, of course this counts too but it's not it's main and unique purpose, the purpose is to continue the civilization or tribe and to a Christian to multiply as God commanded us to do. This is so sick that people find strange people with more than one or two children, people only do so much kids here to get government pensions, to marry with the government.

And last but not least, Westerners or westerner influenced people lives in cowardice, they don't defend these things in public because most of them live a secular life despite being Christians and fear being uncool, suppressing even other Christians if needed to appear cool amongst other people, so it is certain that abortion will be more common, more widespread and childlessness will continue to be the rule until the inevitable collapse of West and westernized nations on the planet.

The Pilgrims in the Desert wrote:"Would you like something to drink?" She opened the fridge. "We have water, milk, juice, spiders, Dr. Pepper-"

"Spiders?"

That reminds me of two of my favorite memes...
"Welcome to Applebees, would you like the apples or the bees?"
and of course Spiders Georg, from whom I learned what statistical outliers are. Every time I find a statistical outlier now I thank my spider-guzzling friend Spiders Georg.

>"average person eats 3 spiders a year" factoid actualy just statistical error. average person eats 0 spiders per year. Spiders Georg, who lives in cave & eats over 10,000 each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted

Saint spyridon

Fedele wrote:Does the Church have an official teaching on the extermination of marsupials?

No. It is wrong to arbitrarily exterminate living creatures, but those that pose a serious threat to society can be killed, so, perhaps it is for the extermination of marsupials.

Fedele and Attike

Fredgast wrote:I don't think this whole LARP government takeover of this place is doing anyone any good honestly as we can see it has only brought division and the first time the new rules (which if enforced correctly I would 100% approve of) where enforced they where used wrongly and in a biased way that caused harm to not only an individual but the community as a whole.
This is the kind of worldly stuff Christians are against and fight against with their lives.

Was it Jesus or the Pharisees that censored people? Was it Jesus or the Pharisees that followed man made rules?

With that said I also would like all who left to return or at least construct an embassy. Oire Saint Constable Quebec le beau

Jesus is Lord.

Goodness gracious!!

Associate with a region of racists, and purveyors of hate speech?!

What would the other regions think of us?

God forbid...

We take the universal call to holiness seriously. It’s easy to just say things in a harsh and impersonal way, but to make saints of all peoples requires tact and the explanation of the faith in a helpful way which the audience can come to adopt in time. We have to love others enough to meet them where they are, and that is what the Core is striving to do.

"Tandis que le monde proclame l'oubli du Dieu de majesté dans tous nos coeurs l'amour acclame, Seigneur Jésus, Ta royauté.

Parle, commande, règne, nous sommes tous à Toi. Jésus étends ton règne de l'univers sois Roi." -a French hymn

"While the world proclaims the oblivion of the God of majesty in all our hearts love cheers, Lord Jesus, Your royalty.

Speak, command, reign. We are all Yours. Jesus extend Your reign, of the universe be King."

Vive Jésus Christ le Roi!

Omensa, Fredgast, Attike, Cristero, and 1 otherPrudentias

Castle Federation wrote:We take the universal call to holiness seriously. It’s easy to just say things in a harsh and impersonal way, but to make saints of all peoples requires tact and the explanation of the faith in a helpful way which the audience can come to adopt in time. We have to love others enough to meet them where they are, and that is what the Core is striving to do.

You are roleplaying a Borgia government very well.

United hispaniola

What is up with the huge resistance from certain Catholics on this board calling each other to increase in holiness?? Stop saying racist things, stop creating scandal by telling us about your sex life, stop making drama where drama doesn't exist! Treat each other like actual humans, for goodness's sake!

For a game all about government, why is there such a big stink about being governed? The purpose of the new government (as should be the purpose for all governments) is to make us better people and lead us to Heaven, and to help us lead others to Heaven. That's their only goal. Sure you have free will and any government is by its nature more oppressive than anarchy, but their rules only exist to make us better people. Calling each other out when we say things contrary to Church teaching helps us grow in holiness, but also helps people who visit this board to understand that we are not hypocrites, we seek to emulate Christ. If you can't picture Christ talking about how a jury was rigged because of implicit bias, maybe that's because you shouldn't be saying it either.

For the region's collective sanity and the sanctity of the Faith, quit the whining and be better.

Medi Terra wrote:If you can't picture Christ talking about how a jury was rigged because of implicit bias, maybe that's because you shouldn't be saying it either.

An excellent post as a whole, but I should comment on this: not only I can picture the Lord denouncing a rigged jury (or even the concept of jury itself), but it seems natural that he would, if there were any reason to do so. I don't know enough about Usonian politics and society to calculate the likelihood of such an event, but it's a legitimate concern. It's the main reason why most Western cultures (except the Anglosphere) have long evolved past the system of Common Law.

Attike a great addition, I just struggle to believe any jury is purposely rigged when both the lawyers for the prosecution and defense have a say in who is seated in the jury. I could have drawn a better comparison in my original statement.

Attike and Prudentias

Fredgast

You become holy not by being forced to but by following the example of Jesus.

Galatians 5:1 "For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery."

2 Corinthians 3:17 "Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom."

Galatians 5:13 "For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another."

James 1:25 "But the one who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer who forgets but a doer who acts, he will be blessed in his doing."

I am a slave to God not to any man or woman, I refuse to be subjected as a slave by anyone let alone a brother. Where there is freedom there is God. Where there is slavery there is Sin and there is Satan.

None of us are completely free of sin that is why this power grab disguised as virtue is terrible. I will keep saying what the holy spirit wants me to say and anyone who is against that is against the spirit which is within me which is God.

Jesus is Lord.

United hispaniola and Prudentias

Fredgast wrote:I am a slave to God not to any man or woman, I refuse to be subjected as a slave by anyone let alone a brother. Where there is freedom there is God. Where there is slavery there is Sin and there is Satan.

In the immortal words of JPII, Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought. Is it then against the law that this government has written to exercise your freedom to speak the Truth? Thus enters the sprit of fraternal correction, which is essential for all of us trying to grow together in virtue. Is not this government (made of your own brothers) not then creating rules that seek to lead us to the greater good through such fraternal correction? There are dozens of ways to say every idea, brother, and only those that sow division or voice anti-Catholic ideals go against the rules of conduct that this government has written.

I'd like to hear how rules against offensive characterization based on race/locker room talk lead us to sin. Shouldn't we avoid these topics anyways because we are of upstanding moral character?

Fredgast wrote:None of us are completely free of sin that is why this power grab disguised as virtue is terrible. I will keep saying what the holy spirit wants me to say and anyone who is against that is against the spirit which is within me which is God.

As you say, none of us are completely free of sin, myself and yourself included. That means that we should be relying on each other to call out when we sin. How can we best do that? I'd say a government with checks and balances, and a variety of people giving input on laws. Join the Discord to do just that, they have a channel devoted to memes. It's cool.

Here's a thought experiment:
You're absolutely right about the slavery of a governing body, how dare they restrict me! We should all abandon the Papacy because of all the ~rules~ it gives us and discern the truths of our faith for ourselves. Forget stuffy old Church documents telling us how to live our lives, they just seek to enslave us. Sounds like a cool idea in the name of freedom, I wonder if anyone has ever done that before. I bet nobody could ever get Fideism wrong.

Or, we can be Catholic and follow just laws from a just government that align with the teachings of the Church.

Medi Terra wrote:What is up with the huge resistance from certain Catholics on this board calling each other to increase in holiness?? Stop saying racist things, stop creating scandal by telling us about your sex life, stop making drama where drama doesn't exist! Treat each other like actual humans, for goodness's sake!

For a game all about government, why is there such a big stink about being governed? The purpose of the new government (as should be the purpose for all governments) is to make us better people and lead us to Heaven, and to help us lead others to Heaven. That's their only goal. Sure you have free will and any government is by its nature more oppressive than anarchy, but their rules only exist to make us better people. Calling each other out when we say things contrary to Church teaching helps us grow in holiness, but also helps people who visit this board to understand that we are not hypocrites, we seek to emulate Christ. If you can't picture Christ talking about how a jury was rigged because of implicit bias, maybe that's because you shouldn't be saying it either.

For the region's collective sanity and the sanctity of the Faith, quit the whining and be better.

Good posts Medi Terra.

I just want to say that I am not against a government, I'm against a government with no law, because it turns actions arbitrary, we need limitation of powers and designation of what a crime is, of course it must be made according to Catholic teaching.

And repeating, I don't write anything racist, you may open the suppressed post and open it, it was far different than the rude post I had with you.

As Oire said in one post, with was strange that they suppressed that post but nothing against the posts that you stand against, it indicates arbitrary reasons instead of a rule of the law.

It is not whining to ask for a government to have law, it is prudence.

United hispaniola

Medi Terra wrote:If you can't picture Christ talking about how a jury was rigged because of implicit bias, maybe that's because you shouldn't be saying it either.

I can imagine that after going through his Crucifixion and Passion at the hands of a mob calling for "justice" while sparing Barabbas might leave Christ with personal insight on this issue besides his infinite wisdom.
A jury is not a divine institution, nor infallible .

Castle Federation wrote:The current government structure does not have a formal constitution but an amalgamation of laws as they develop into a tradition overtime. There is in fact a current proposal that will concretely outline decorum here and in the Core's Discord so I assure you that everything discussed above is being addressed.

An amalgamation of law? Or the amalgamation of arbitrary decisions? A constitution is based on principles, even the Magna Carta was made to protect governed from the governor, from dubious sentences without law! This is "habeas corpus", your government is an oligarchy on the Aristotelian sense of the word, to say the least.

United hispaniola and Fredgast

Prudentias I believe there was no stand against our previous discussion because the government was not yet formed, although I agree the one that was suppressed was tamer in comparison. The core and laws are formed now, and the main disagreement with the post in question was that they felt it took away the rational nature of humans and suggested that people only ever agree with the box their skin color paints them in. I will reserve my own judgement, but they're waiting for you to plead your case in the Rota. The law is not arbitrary, but I agree that they should have written it and approved it before suppressing your post.

The fact of the matter is that the RMB was devolving into a very dark and unfriendly place. Frankly, I almost left the region several times because some of the things being shared made me so uncomfortable being posted under the name of my faith. The core is aiming to make it a more hospitable environment that draws people to the faith.

United hispaniola I agree, as I mentioned earlier I should have picked a better example or drawn it to the issue better. Here: In Christ there is neither Gentile nor Jew, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female. I believe that painting people into a box because of skin color would not be supported by Christ, and we should not stoop to doing it ourselves. Whether the Core should have suppressed the original statement because of that is another matter. I think discussion leaves room for fraternal correction, but fraternal correction with strangers on the internet doesn't usually go very far.

Prudentias wrote:An amalgamation of law? Or the amalgamation of arbitrary decisions? A constitution is based on principles, even the Magna Carta was made to protect governed from the governor, from dubious sentences without law! This is "habeas corpus", your government is an oligarchy on the Aristotelian sense of the word, to say the least.

A constitution is a rather modern concept. The Core is governed by the Supreme College which consists of any willing member of the region who wishes to be a citizen. It has backed all of my decisions up to this point. The legal tradition slowly builds as more Orders are passed into law which creates a structure that is easily alterable by the whole. I have tried diligently to remain a fair and reasonable head of the government, and I believe that includes your grievances.

I am frankly surprised that we are all still talking about this since it will have absolutely no desirable outcome.

Medi Terra, Attike, and Cristero

United hispaniola

Castle Federation wrote:

I am frankly surprised that we are all still talking about this since it will have absolutely no desirable outcome.

No one should be surprised by your contemptuous attitude towards dialogue on the regional message board.

Post by The Sovereign Realist State suppressed by Castle Federation.

Medi Terra wrote:The fact of the matter is that the RMB was devolving into a very dark and unfriendly place. Frankly, I almost left the region several times because some of the things being shared made me so uncomfortable being posted under the name of my faith. The core is aiming to make it a more hospitable environment that draws people to the faith.

This is to me the most absolute indictment of anyone, pretending to have any moral authority, to opine on civic regulation.

I don't know how old you are but if you do not have the emotional maturity to read opposing view points without being triggered, you should be the last person to make decisions or even as little as commenting on such matters.

The only 'darkness' I see is biased censorship and disrespect. But I suppose your sensitivities are not quite as affected when people are gagged for their views, if those don't happen to conform with yours.

If you believe God created us, then you should also believe that he created us to have differences. To stifle those differences is not moral.

Since you're ok with being silenced for your views, and since surely you are not a hypocrite, then I leave the same suggestion I have left to others: go ahead and delete your previous comments; I am offended, therefore they need to go.

United hispaniola

Post self-deleted by Medi Terra.

OK, that's enough. I will not stand for this any longer.

I'm out.

United hispaniola

«12. . .442443444445446447448. . .516517»

Advertisement