«12. . .2,2662,2672,2682,2692,2702,2712,272. . .2,5672,568»
Yeah. That's why groups like the CIA, FBI, and CPC cover them up or deny them rather than just using them.
Negative numbers in an industry means your nation purchases more imports than it produces locally. You are buying food from other nations.
As for the old age thing, you may find it difficult to keep up some of your other statistics if you cause other death types to take over. It's a matter of lifetime: dead citizens do no work and spend no money.
I wonder. Is it a concidence. That your a father knows best and have an old flag of me. Well
History repeats itself.
I just realized. That balder's WA delegate has changed.
Press F to pay respects for Kingdom of North East Somerset's rule. So close to being the longest serving king yet so far
Who's the longest serving ruler?
need some trading card advice.
so far I'm selling uncommons ( estimated .05 value ) for 10 if its a basic flag/name, 15 for interesting flag, and sometimes 20 if its a good looking s3 who no ones bid for yet. id assume that's a good medium but people keep bidding low enough as junk price and selling for 1-5 DOLLARS? if you need I have folders of all the cards I've put a sell price for and all the ones I'm keeping
also the 'ell is up with the Declaration Against Declarations issue lmao?
Just look at balder's history
He is the longest serving King.
Depends on what you consider ruler. The former Queen is the longest serving Delegate while the head of the executive, The Statsminister, who technically dictates regional policy is possibly the new King, I would have to look into that though since we've had more Statsministers than Delegates and back when I was Delegate I was also head of the executive as that was the structure at the time.
In otherwords if you consider the Delegate as the rule it would be Solorni, if you consider the Statsminister(the policy maker) as the ruler then it's possibly the new King.
Apparently I am at war with the Tasmanians. In my defense, they killed the birds I like. No one kills my birds. No one.
Yeah, me too, because of the same incident again. I guess Tasmania is at war because of Birds with dozen nations all the time.
Well, this is the new one! A new recommendation has been released for the SC resolution: "Declaration Against Declarations"
Ministry analysis:
This declaration seeks to declare it's opposition to declarations by highlighting that they're used as "platitudes" and serve no real purpose within the Security Council
Ministry Recommendation:
We believe that this resolution does not sufficiently defend nor elaborate it's assertions.
Providing little to no explications for their reasonings. Furthermore, this would result in the security council opposing an entire section of it's own resolutions. Annulling a large amount of resolutions brought to the Council. Finally, this "declaration against declarations" is self contradictory, highlighting the issues of declarations while at the same time using the same platform to write the resolution.
Because of the above, the WA ministry declares it's recommendation, and encourages voters AGAINST
The Security Council declaration: "declaration against declarations"
Done! Any thoughts? Or questions?
P.s: explication IS a word.
San Arys and United triads
Tasmania must have one big military if they're at war with every nation on earth because of bird killings
Look, real trees are trending downward. Your sales continue slipping. They destroyed your bottom lines with plastic pines and same day shipping. Well, you have the better product. But if you want to win. You gotta study human nature, all those interested, lean in.
Guys! Guys!
I just found a nation that's super rich and has a small defense force! If we all gather arms and beat them up, we can take all their money and split it among us, WE'RE GONNA BE RICH!!!
(and yes, I know you can't actually do that... although doing an event where we play strategy games against other regions would be fun)
waddup
hi
Aelyria and Gitche Gumee
I urge everyone to vote AGAINST the current WA legislation. While it is intended to provide an absolutely vital right, the law as written is effectively unenforceable, allowing nations almost total latitude and giving effectively no recourse for individuals oppressed in the name of arbitrary and capricious "compelling government interests," which are neither defined nor discussed to ANY degree in the text.
Rather than protecting the right to religious freedom, this law would ensure that any nation which wants to suppress religion in its borders simply needs to come up with a paper-thin excuse and could then do so with impunity, fully supported by the WA. I don't often ask for such things, but I humbly request that all WA members in Balder consider voting against it, and petition His Highness 
Fooooooooo to consider giving this No vote royal assent.
The Free United Nations, Bestelesnia, Kaliitnuunati, and Jackuul
I just hate rights
Robert downey jr, Vocomia, and English Cambodia
«12. . .2,2662,2672,2682,2692,2702,2712,272. . .2,5672,568»
Advertisement
