by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .21,69021,69121,69221,69321,69421,69521,696. . .27,96927,970»

Post by Eastern newlandian republic suppressed by a moderator.

Eastern newlandian republic wrote:He is even more left than stalin.

Proof? I don't believe a democratic socialist is more left than a full-on communist dictator who ran a country that has full control over means of production... at least last I checked

North of Americas, San guglielmo, Kanokla, Eco-Paris Reformation, and 2 othersEastern newlandian republic, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Eastern newlandian republic wrote:He is even more left than stalin.

Haha. Actually, Bernie's about as left as Nordic social democracy

North of Americas, Yahlia, Kanokla, Eco-Paris Reformation, and 2 othersEastern newlandian republic, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Great new sealand

Eastern newlandian republic wrote:He is even more left than stalin.

Huh?

North of Americas, Laver Island, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, and 5 othersKanokla, Eco-Paris Reformation, New skandenivia, Eastern newlandian republic, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Berlin and Hanover wrote:Yeah, but he's not the norm for democrats. Look before Barack Obama, they didn't even support LGBTQ+ rights, although they are a bit more progressive now.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden, at least until 2015, never endorsed homosexual weddings. In 2008, there was a video of Biden indicating that he and Obama did not favor homosexual weddings or anything along those lines, I think. They didn't start supporting LGBT people until they saw it was having a detrimental effect on voting demographics.

"Vice President Joe Biden has apologized to President Barack Obama for putting him in a tough position that led to Obama’s announcement that he now supports same-sex marriage, senior administration officials said Thursday.

Obama said in an interview that aired Thursday on ABC that he made his decision public earlier than he had planned after Biden’s weekend remark that he was “absolutely comfortable” with letting gays and lesbians marry.

Two senior administration officials said Biden and Obama met Wednesday morning, and Biden apologized for putting Obama in a tough spot. Obama responded by saying that he knew Biden was speaking from the heart, said the officials, who didn’t want to be named discussing private conversations between the president and vice president.

Biden’s remarks on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday launched a controversy that led to Obama announcing that his position on same-sex marriage, which he had previously called “evolving,” had shifted to support. When Obama’s full interview aired Thursday, he said his disclosure came sooner than planned as a result of Biden’s comments."

North of Americas, Libertandonien, San guglielmo, Kanokla, and 3 othersThe new mexican confederation, Kurdislavic algharbistan, and Berlin and Hanover

Big boi Bernie is clearly ingsoc's big brother.

Great new sealand, Eco-Paris Reformation, Le vichy france, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Le vichy france

Berlin and Hanover wrote:Am I a communist for listening to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JrPDeSPSzk&t=694s this on loop?

I used to love that game so much,
But honestly listening to YouTube music is how most Americans pick their political ideology so maybee

Eco-Paris Reformation, The new mexican confederation, Kurdislavic algharbistan, and Berlin and Hanover

Great new sealand

Le vichy france wrote:I used to love that game so much,
But honestly listening to YouTube music is how most Americans pick their political ideology so maybee

political compass quiz go brrrr

“China Is Communist in Name Only.”

Wrong. If Vladimir Lenin were reincarnated in 21st-century Beijing and managed to avert his eyes from the city’s glittering skyscrapers and conspicuous consumption, he would instantly recognize in the ruling Chinese Communist Party a replica of the system he designed nearly a century ago for the victors of the Bolshevik Revolution. One need only look at the party’s structure to see how communist — and Leninist — China’s political system remains.

Sure, China long ago dumped the core of the communist economic system, replacing rigid central planning with commercially minded state enterprises that coexist with a vigorous private sector. Yet for all their liberalization of the economy, Chinese leaders have been careful to keep control of the commanding heights of politics through the party’s grip on the “three Ps”: personnel, propaganda, and the People’s Liberation Army.

The PLA is the party’s military, not the country’s. Unlike in the West, where controversies often arise about the potential politicization of the military, in China the party is on constant guard for the opposite phenomenon, the depoliticization of the military. Their fear is straightforward: the loss of party control over the generals and their troops. In 1989, one senior general refused to march his soldiers into Beijing to clear students out of Tiananmen Square, an incident now seared into the ruling class’s collective memory. After all, the army’s crackdown on the demonstrations preserved the party’s hold on power in 1989, and its leaders have since worked hard to keep the generals on their side, should they be needed to put down protests again.

As in the Soviet Union, the party controls the media through its Propaganda Department, which issues daily directives, both formally on paper and in emails and text messages, and informally over the phone, to the media. The directives set out, often in detail, how news considered sensitive by the party — such as the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo — should be handled or whether it should be run at all.

Perhaps most importantly, the party dictates all senior personnel appointments in ministries and companies, universities and the media, through a shadowy and little-known body called the Organization Department. Through the department, the party oversees just about every significant position in every field in the country. Clearly, the Chinese remember Stalin’s dictate that the cadres decide everything.

Indeed, if you benchmark the Chinese Communist Party against a definitional checklist authored by Robert Service, the veteran historian of the Soviet Union, the similarities are remarkable. As with communism in its heyday elsewhere, the party in China has eradicated or emasculated political rivals, eliminated the autonomy of the courts and media, restricted religion and civil society, denigrated rival versions of nationhood, centralized political power, established extensive networks of security police, and dispatched dissidents to labor camps. There is a good reason why the Chinese system is often described as “market-Leninism.”

“The Party Controls All Aspects of Life in China.”

San guglielmo, Kurdislavic algharbistan, and Berlin and Hanover

Great new sealand wrote:political compass quiz go brrrr

That quiz is wack.

I don't believe that star signs determine my future so I'm lib left... Wat!?

Kurdislavic algharbistan

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:snip

could you put a spoiler please?

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:
“China Is Communist in Name Only.”

Wrong. If Vladimir Lenin were reincarnated in 21st-century Beijing and managed to avert his eyes from the city’s glittering skyscrapers and conspicuous consumption, he would instantly recognize in the ruling Chinese Communist Party a replica of the system he designed nearly a century ago for the victors of the Bolshevik Revolution. One need only look at the party’s structure to see how communist — and Leninist — China’s political system remains.

Sure, China long ago dumped the core of the communist economic system, replacing rigid central planning with commercially minded state enterprises that coexist with a vigorous private sector. Yet for all their liberalization of the economy, Chinese leaders have been careful to keep control of the commanding heights of politics through the party’s grip on the “three Ps”: personnel, propaganda, and the People’s Liberation Army.

The PLA is the party’s military, not the country’s. Unlike in the West, where controversies often arise about the potential politicization of the military, in China the party is on constant guard for the opposite phenomenon, the depoliticization of the military. Their fear is straightforward: the loss of party control over the generals and their troops. In 1989, one senior general refused to march his soldiers into Beijing to clear students out of Tiananmen Square, an incident now seared into the ruling class’s collective memory. After all, the army’s crackdown on the demonstrations preserved the party’s hold on power in 1989, and its leaders have since worked hard to keep the generals on their side, should they be needed to put down protests again.

As in the Soviet Union, the party controls the media through its Propaganda Department, which issues daily directives, both formally on paper and in emails and text messages, and informally over the phone, to the media. The directives set out, often in detail, how news considered sensitive by the party — such as the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo — should be handled or whether it should be run at all.

Perhaps most importantly, the party dictates all senior personnel appointments in ministries and companies, universities and the media, through a shadowy and little-known body called the Organization Department. Through the department, the party oversees just about every significant position in every field in the country. Clearly, the Chinese remember Stalin’s dictate that the cadres decide everything.

Indeed, if you benchmark the Chinese Communist Party against a definitional checklist authored by Robert Service, the veteran historian of the Soviet Union, the similarities are remarkable. As with communism in its heyday elsewhere, the party in China has eradicated or emasculated political rivals, eliminated the autonomy of the courts and media, restricted religion and civil society, denigrated rival versions of nationhood, centralized political power, established extensive networks of security police, and dispatched dissidents to labor camps. There is a good reason why the Chinese system is often described as “market-Leninism.”

“The Party Controls All Aspects of Life in China.”

Is there like a tl;dr? I can and will not read this, I apologize eco, your paragraphs (or essays) are far too complex for my tiny little brain to understand :D

Eco-Paris Reformation and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Great new sealand

Anglonica wrote:That quiz is wack.

I don't believe that star signs determine my future so I'm lib left... Wat!?

you've got to really frig up to get anything other than libleft lol

The new mexican confederation

Le vichy france wrote:I used to love that game so much,
But honestly listening to YouTube music is how most Americans pick their political ideology so maybee

Middle schoolers on their way to become radicalized Marxists after listening to the USSR anthem

The New Nordic Union, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, Eco-Paris Reformation, and 3 othersEastern newlandian republic, Kurdislavic algharbistan, and Berlin and Hanover

Going on tinder to tell guys that investing in crypto isn't a personality
Wish me luck

Einswenn, North of Americas, The New Nordic Union, Yahlia, and 6 othersSt Scarlett, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, Eco-Paris Reformation, New skandenivia, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Great new sealand

Laver Island wrote:Going on tinder to tell guys that investing in crypto isn't a personality
Wish me luck

Based

Great new sealand wrote:you've got to really frig up to get anything other than libleft lol

My last test put me Auth left. I'm going to try it again...

Eco-Paris Reformation and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Laver Island wrote:Going on tinder to tell guys that investing in crypto isn't a personality
Wish me luck

Oh, my goodness!! If you see Elon Musk on there, please let me know! He's someone I'd like to meet! You might take him out on a great date to a NASA facility near you! Get you some doge coins... 🤭

Laver Island, Libertandonien, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:Oh, my goodness!! If you see Elon Musk on there, please let me know! He's someone I'd like to meet! You might take him out on a great date to a NASA facility near you! Get you some doge coins... 🤭

Idk if I should cringe or laugh at this lmao

Yahlia, St Scarlett, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, and 2 othersEco-Paris Reformation, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Post by Eastern newlandian republic suppressed by a moderator.

Great new sealand

Eastern newlandian republic wrote:last time i checked he was staring blankly into nothing from his porch...
Who knows what is inside his mind?

how does this relate to bernie sanders being more left than stalin

North of Americas, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, Eco-Paris Reformation, and 2 othersEastern newlandian republic, and Kurdislavic algharbistan

Post by Eastern newlandian republic suppressed by a moderator.

The new mexican confederation

Great new sealand wrote:you've got to really frig up to get anything other than libleft lol

Then should I be worried I got auth right?

Rivierenland, Eco-Paris Reformation, and Eastern newlandian republic

Great new sealand

The new mexican confederation wrote:Then should I be worried I got auth right?

No because whoever made the compass is probably a leftie

Rivierenland, Libertandonien, Eco-Paris Reformation, The new mexican confederation, and 1 otherEastern newlandian republic

https://www.politicalcompass.org/chart?ec=-0.38&soc=0.36

I believe this is still wrong.

Eco-Paris Reformation and Eastern newlandian republic

«12. . .21,69021,69121,69221,69321,69421,69521,696. . .27,96927,970»

Advertisement