«12. . .5,8605,8615,8625,8635,8645,8655,866. . .28,61828,619»
Don’t be concerned, Dear. You are not the first man to have lied to me, and I’m sure that you will not be the last. Have fun, and enjoy yourself!
Post by Minskiev suppressed by 
Wabbitslayah.
Post self-deleted by The final sith order.
What? What makes me a douchebag?
And I am not, but like I said, it’s for Role Playing Purposes.
Wait... You were joking??
Oh sorry about that. 👌
Even in jest, that would be considered flaming by NS rules. Which, is against our RMB Policy. Please be careful how you word things, the game mods periodically check into TRR and I don't want you getting into trouble.
Yy4u, Tinhampton, Aandruzognivia, and Thepeopl
Uhh wow ok sorry?
Ok. I have a question I am trying to make an effort to ask
How are you still the suppresser of the baddies for an day if it has been 32 days now?
One of your friends have been avoiding this question. Please, tell me. And if you were that good, WHATS with the title?
Post by West ardius suppressed by a moderator.
Post by West ardius suppressed by a moderator.
Hmmm that depends
Also
What ideological position are you in?
well hello rejects.
my answer to today's poll
harry potter books have a terrible story, no plot twist and are extremely bad. I dislike them all equally.
Down with Harry Potter.
Aandruzognivia, Thepeopl, and The dreaded dormammu
I don't discord that much, but I imagine that it happened like this: (35 days ago)
Wabbit: the rmb watchdogs are inactive, see all spam in our rmb.
Cabinet member: well we do have lives...
Wabbit: just make me suppressor of the baddies, I'll will be active today.
Cm: just today?
Wabbit: yeah, just a day.
Or maybe:
Wabbit: we should have a schedule for when which ro (= regional officer= mod for rmb) has suppression of the Baddies duty.
I'll help, for a day...
The title is just that. A title. So if you think of a nice description for "suppressor of the baddies" do sent them to our culture officer. 
A Leaf on the Wind
If the title would say something about someone being the best, "a" would be "the"
Like: employee of the month.
Time to go to war!
The World Assembly Staff's recent Pros and Cons list provides interesting insight into "Ethical Treatment of Animals" you may not have thought of! Make sure to spend just a few minutes to check it out here:
The proposal addresses animal rights issues with a compromise. It gives flexibility towards beneficial researchers in testing while still mandating humane treatment and animal conservation efforts.
The proposal has the General Fund support researchers in need of money to treat animals humanely, which supports scientific research, which includes some that may improve the lives of animals.
This could be a reason to vote against if you are against the World Assembly's ever-expanding need for
national funding.
Clause 2b states that “Animal research institutes may not develop products whose main purpose is to harm animals physically or psychologically unless the product minimises the suffering of an animal harmed or killed for a lawful purpose or its function is of material benefit to its sapient owner.” Which clearly allows animal abuse for the sake of material gain. While this is an exception that is certainly not in the spirit of the law, it neuters much of its ability to protect animals.
An "animal" is defined as a non-sapient being with a nervous system or equivalent system by which it is naturally able to experience pain;” this definition arguably excludes great apes and potentially other primates, perhaps the animals most deserving legal protection, depending on your interpretation of the WA definition of sapient.
Remember to upvote! This will further our attempt at unbiased WA reporting.
Tinhampton, Aandruzognivia, Bormiar, Emotiland, and 1 otherImperialism of empire
I think many like the Goblet of Fire because Edward Cullen was there.
We smart. Yes. :-)
Post by Ladu suppressed by a moderator.
«12. . .5,8605,8615,8625,8635,8645,8655,866. . .28,61828,619»
Advertisement
