Post

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=500529&sid=310881afd56f9dd6d135e7cf8c2cdee6

If you would give some attention to this thread, feedback would be appreciated. It recommends, among other things, separating the GA & SC. I'd also like to add the thread suggests "The two-endorsement requirement, which is trivial and provides no real barrier to submitting proposals, would be scrapped entirely" and "Endorsements could be given and received only by SC members. The endorsement-based delegate election system would not change, but delegates would only receive extra votes for SC proposals".

Arclandians are not interested in this. As a peaceful nation who would immediately leave the SC, we balk at the suggestion that we should eschew participation in endorsement trading as a means of networking with our regional allies, and we further find untenable that this oversimplifies the endorsement system into strictly a raiding tool. It is additionally our perspective that implementation would be unduly taxing on volunteers who already expressed in this very conversation early on that such a restructure would be overburdening. We agree with the above assertion that the topic should have stopped there but would like to highlight that this proverbial dead horse has become a metaphorical wraith (a loud, annoying, undead spectre to be clear) because a sponsor is using the WA member group messaging to put it in our inboxes as if it merited the attention.

Please, desist. This suggestion is subpar; if it had a hope of gaining support, it would have by now, and you would not have to campaign for it this hard. Even if Arclandia were not voting against all WA legislation except repeals as a form of protest, we would still vote against this if it ever made it to a WA vote.

Resolvedly,
Arc Ignius Rex
Chief Public Administrator