«12. . .21,68921,69021,69121,69221,69321,69421,695. . .24,40724,408»
Any of the challengers would do just fine, this is a low-stress election.
You act like me not being in the region isn't the best thing that has ever happened here period.
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=357511&p=35229603#p35229603
made the CTFU Suvurnia posts even more realistic, see if you can see the change
Of the nations who possess Nuclear weapons in the region, what are they based off of from IRL weapons. I have stated in the past that Domanania had 2 weapons of less than or equal yield to Little Boy, but now im thinking of swapping those out for <500 small tactical nuclear artillery shells, similar to the W33 weapon used by the USA.
We have massive nicllear turbo drones
Didn’t we get a proposal through that pretty much offers you a vote?
More specifically in regards to the election:
Not sure if I can decisively pick between the three candidates who have given a speech, so I’ve abstained for now. However, i do encourage those who inevitably lose (there likely will be three of you) to get involved in the RP office as activity monitors, assistants etc. It gives you experience and gives the SoRP so much more time and clear headspace to deal with things that a senior officer really needs to have clear judgement to do. Also, you can knife/challenge the SoRP Australia-style if they go inactive or for other reasons.
Ok, wait how do I make it clear what my foreign policy is? Probably sounds like a dumb question but I'm confused.
Miniaturizing warheads to that size is a pretty advanced step, I don't think it would be realistic to go to that level without having other bombs. And 500 is a lot. By warhead count I think that would make you 3rd in the world, beating France by a significant margin.
Ostehaar and Athara magarat
Either write it down or just be consistent with how you roleplay it. And that means taking your lumps when something has unintended consequences. Pulling your ambassador from the League and backing down when there is the slightest opposition to your plans makes your nation look weak, directionless and unstable. That's not a good look. Sometimes you have to accept the fallout for something and live with that.
Dormill and Stiura and Belle ilse en terre
Also, I'll note for posterity that the others aren't wrong; sending piles of cash to a developing nation can be highly problematic. It only really works if the country is already known to respect the rule of law and have good distributive measures for aid in place. MS has a tendency to lose a lot of cash along the way as government officials line their pockets.
I'll keep that in mind
If you're referring to the Honorary Membership Amendment: it was never put to vote due to lack of support.
So what's been happening? Besides the election and stuff
Stuff and things
I think this year's Blessing Day (a religious holiday in Enchanta) might be the biggest celebration of the 21st century in the country.
In your country or are you planning on setting a world record that will last another 81 years?
Solution for the wall:
1)Annex Mexico
2)Grant all Mexicans US citizenship (no more Mexican immigrants)
3)Build a much smaller wall on former mexico's southern border.
Just a little idea from across the pond :D
Athara magarat, Norstham, and Nhoor
Interesting........
What did the Belizeans and the Guatemal..ans? ..teques? ever do to you? Ö
We did it once lets have the Mexican-American War Part II
fair enough on the advanced tech part. I only think of them because: The US had over 2,000 of the W33 and hundreds or thousands other types of warheads. And today even countries like Israel are believed to have some.
He might of just found the warheads at the bottom of the ocean
Domanania and Belle ilse en terre
«12. . .21,68921,69021,69121,69221,69321,69421,695. . .24,40724,408»
Advertisement
