«12. . .35363738394041. . .7475»
Really?
Last time I checked it was two, although I would guess I am mistaken, as you are the one who wrote the law.
You need two vouchers.
You can appeal. The law is that if one RO vouches for you, a case for your appeal can be formed. It is also possible for the Chief Justice to be disqualified from handling a case should they be found to be incapable of competently and impartially handling the case.
Can you deal with Wooloos on Discord
I would suggest against. He is a liability to the region and has caused great drama.
Warning #5 5/22/21 [Warned for NSFW post]
Warning #4 5/9/21 [Warned for Recruiting]
Warning #3 4/18/21 [Warned for Quote Editing]
Warning #2 4/14/21 [Warned for Flaming]
Warning #1 4/10/21 [Warned for Spamming]
Warning #6 3/11/22 [warned for pg18+ content]
This is his warning log. A pleathra of repeat offences and frankly some of the worse offenses when it comes to ioc law.
I can't support this and neither should you. I get your a kind person but i would suggest to pull back your support. Its not in ours nor yours best interests. Its going to cause much future pain
Section 6. A. Two (2) months after their date of disposition, an indefinitely banned nation may attain an official "vouch" or word of support from at least one (1) RO, which is to be mandatory to commence the process of appeal for clemency.
Zarbik and Xeosia later
Wow. I think I may have to read the factbook again if I've gotten this rusty. Could I get a link to it?
Honestly the only thing im doing is making an appeal. Ima let the professionals handle it. If anyone wants to vouch then they can do it
Didn’t oc say one? Im even more confused now
One voucher. I don't get why this is a argument.
It should be in the law books
Ima not even question it at this point. Let the guys in charge work things out
Thats a fair point. If i do get unbanned, if you have to warn me once, you can ban with no appeal. No matter the offense
This may take some time yi... Sorry for the wait
Its fine I understand. I just heard that it was possible so I kinda wanted to see. Didn’t want it to be this big of an issue tho
Okay,
I take evdince
Yi
submit your evidence that you have infact changed.
Alright. Idrk how that works. I just came back from a long hiatus from NS. Like if you can just elaborate that would be nice
...As i said
Give me evdince
that you have changed.
Ah. I have found a rule that makes this a pretty open and shut case.
"4. _Permabans are indefinite bans which cannot be revoked or appealed under any circumstances. These shall never be directly handed out to offenders. In order for a permaban to be made, the offender must first be reviewed by the King and the Prime Minister so that a ruling may be given. Once accomplished, the ruling is turned over to the Minister of Justice, who shall give the final decision on whether or not the offending nation must be permabanned. In the event that the King and/or Prime Minister are unavailable, the offending nation shall be kept indefinitely banned until the ruling can then be made."
Since Yi was permabanned, this rule comes into effect. It cannot be revoked or appealed under any circumstance.
I don’t understand what that measn
The law was changed, Permabans no longer exist. I believe all exciting permanent bans were converted to indefinites.
Zarbik, Xeosia later, and Kingdom Of Englands
KOE has removed his voucher on you
Appeal, Denied
Correct
f***ING W H A T
I was not informed of that! Ho-ly ****!
Thanks and done. Case over
I was not informed that change had been made.
«12. . .35363738394041. . .7475»
Advertisement