«12. . .8,4868,4878,4888,4898,4908,4918,492. . .8,6908,691»
removed. the jural part was largely just an afterthought, i don't know if i even like it myself
basically you're saying get rid of arbitrary bans without trial?
one sec imma make a few revisions
Balooist coup 2024?
I stand by my math even though it can be considered undefined as well as infinity.
What is that system?
will add a part about government transperancy
Isnt that already going to be covered in the monthly reports on the forums?
the judiciary can always be more transparent
the government should always remain truthful. government discussions about certain decissions should be published and made avaliable to the public, such as screenshots about discussions (yes i am a radical /j)
We are already transparent, how can we become even more transparent?
We already do that
do you publish screenshots? how can the citizens trust the government to remain truthful?
im not saying that the government is lying, i'm saying that the government could lie.
Why do we need to publish screenshots?
how can the citizens trust the government to remain truthful?
im not saying that the government is lying, i'm saying that the government could lie.
Asking for screenshots it’s too much for so little. And I think you are exaggerating a lot about THAT type of transparency.
yo mg added me on kugeln
bros stealing my bf
i am a radical for a reason /j
you have a point, but (JUST IN CASE RAAAH)
Baloo Kingdom, Rhenzern, and ARIsyan-
LAMElista will surely fall to the deep state…. /s
the thing about what i'm saying, is that this scenario has happened before. not on purpose on accident tho.
ari with his announcements regarding ventura's ban messed a few things up.
and the government got confused about aa's involvement in the ucn closing embassies.
i'm not saying the government would do it on purpose.
sort of, but now that you're mentioning it there's always the appeal option.
still however, the normal format for bans is that people should go on trial first, then appeal afterwards. so i'm conflicted about that section now
It’s just the wording. I thought I was clear enough when I made that announcement but apparently not.
So no, we don’t need screenshots and I am definitely not doing that in an online site such as NS.
eh, your opinion.
do have a point tho
«12. . .8,4868,4878,4888,4898,4908,4918,492. . .8,6908,691»
Advertisement
