Liberal Democratic UnionBoard

Hey guys, Lugarvatn here

I'm going to give you notes that I'm sorry for moving on to Brebina, I didn't know that region is a fascist region ruled by Gorutimania, who is the previous owner of Coalition of NS Fascists, even without my presence in your region, I hope your happy that I changed my opinions about it, LDU is not a communist region, but rather a region of diversity with different types of ideologies

Love you all,
Lugarvatn <3

Novikqueland wrote:

Hey guys, Lugarvatn here

I'm going to give you notes that I'm sorry for moving on to Brebina, I didn't know that region is a fascist region ruled by Gorutimania, who is the previous owner of Coalition of NS Fascists, even without my presence in your region, I hope your happy that I changed my opinions about it, LDU is not a communist region, but rather a region of diversity with different types of ideologies

Love you all,
Lugarvatn <3

Hello Lugarvatn

Thanks for your apology. I think we all were not completely, or at best only vaguely, aware of Gorutimania's and other Brebina-member's past, so it would be insufficient to counter you on that. It should indeed be noted that the LDU is not a communist region, and I am glad you are as strong as you are to tell us that you were wrong about your assumptions.

Sjevre
Governor

Sjevre wrote:

Aaandd now Ukraine is third

I'm glad Ukraine and Israel did well on the televote, but Austria ranking so low breaks my heart. Rave is sadly dead ;(

dead chat

NewKazakhBy wrote:

Return Maximus Vernum Malifica to me pls

why? and what do I get in return?

Sjevre wrote:

why? and what do I get in return?

He's literally a big criminal. Is Sjevre a safe harbor for criminals?

Einsiev wrote:

One corn chip.

Ok I'm in

Welcome back: Probably Illegal Stuff

https://youtu.be/ha7B8ridmuY?si=_KeEHouf6Zu3cCNE

Sjevre wrote:

Give me evidence

You'll have it in court.
(If anything, government really has evidence.)

Sjevre wrote:

What am I going to court for?

You're not going, it'll be a trial to find if the suspect's guilt. This is literally how extradition requests work, first there is a trial to see if the suspect is guilty.

Sjevre wrote:

oh lol, I thought you were dragging me to court cuz you said; "you'll have it in court"

You're next

Sjevre I asked ChatGPT to find some contradictions in the constitution and it found these. What do you think? I may write an amendment adressing these.

There seem to be a few potential contradictions and areas where clarity could be improved within the text:

Governor's Powers: The text states that the Governor retains ultimate administrative control of the region but also mentions that they are subject to the Constitution. However, the Governor is granted veto power over amendments to the Constitution, which might be seen as contradictory if the Governor's power is indeed subject to the Constitution.

Successor's Powers and Role: While the text outlines the roles and requirements for the Successor, it's not entirely clear what powers they hold beyond assisting the Governor and being apolitical. Additionally, it mentions that the Successor has no right to stand above the law, which could be seen as ambiguous without further clarification on what laws specifically apply to the Successor.

Congress and Citizenship: There could be potential contradictions regarding the roles and powers of Congress. For example, while all members of Congress are granted the power to propose amendments to the Constitution, it's not explicitly stated whether this power extends to enacting laws or if it's solely related to constitutional matters. Furthermore, the text outlines minimum requirements for citizenship, but it's not clear if Congress has the authority to further restrict citizenship beyond these requirements.

Impeachment and Succession: The text outlines the process for impeachment and succession in the event of an inactive member of the Administration or if an administering nation commits a breach of office. However, it doesn't specify whether this process applies universally to all positions within the Administration or if there are different procedures for impeaching certain positions.

Ban Appeal Rules: The ban appeal rules outline various requirements that must be met for an appeal to be accepted. While these requirements are comprehensive, there may be some contradictions or ambiguities in how they are applied, especially regarding the unanimity of support from the government and approval by Congress.

Overall, while the text provides a detailed framework for governance within the Liberal Democratic Union, there are areas where contradictions or ambiguities could be addressed to ensure consistency and clarity in the interpretation and implementation of the Constitution.