«12. . .269270271272273274275. . .313314»
We are now debating Amendments to LR 018 Rewarding Thaecians Contributions. This bill has already passed the House.
Sponsor: Snowflame
Noting that nations who are removed from Thaecia for posing a threat to her sovereignty, safety, or security, or have violated one of her laws, are still entitled to keep their membership of the Order of Thaecia,
Believing that these such nations should be removed from the order as an extension of the ban, not as something that may or may not occur depending on the Prime Minister,
Congress hereby agrees,
IV - Any member of the Order that is banned or proscribed from Thaecia shall be automatically stripped from their rank.
- Their rank shall not be automatically returned if their prohibition from Thaecia ends; they must be reawarded.
- If their prohibition from Thaecia is wholly overturned by the High Court, their rank shall be automatically returned.
I feel this bill is very necessary for regional security and implore Senators to vote for it.
Aye I agree with Rayekka's standpoint
Very necessary and simple amendment, those who have been proscribed don't deserve to be celebrated, I support
We are now voting on Amendments to LR 018 Rewarding Thaecians Contributions. This bill has already passed the House.
Sponsor: Snowflame
Noting that nations who are removed from Thaecia for posing a threat to her sovereignty, safety, or security, or have violated one of her laws, are still entitled to keep their membership of the Order of Thaecia,
Believing that these such nations should be removed from the order as an extension of the ban, not as something that may or may not occur depending on the Prime Minister,
Congress hereby agrees,
IV - Any member of the Order that is banned or proscribed from Thaecia shall be automatically stripped from their rank.
- Their rank shall not be automatically returned if their prohibition from Thaecia ends; they must be reawarded.
- If their prohibition from Thaecia is wholly overturned by the High Court, their rank shall be automatically returned.
I vote Aye.
Abstain.
Aye
The Amendments to LR 018 Rewarding Thaecians Contributions has passed the Senate 3-1-3. This is now sent to Prime Minister 
Marvinville's desk.
We are now debating Judicial Framework Act Amendments.
To provide for a better appeals process,
Congress enacts the following:
Section I - Article II Section II Sub-section III shall be amended to read the following:
Sub-section III - Appeals are a proceeding which, if successful, would have the High Court overturn a criminal case decision of any court or a legal review of a lower court if the court in question erred in their judgement.Section II - Article II Section V of L.R. 056 shall be amended to read the following:
Section V - For appeals, the filing citizen or an individual recently banned due to having been convicted of a crime must prove with the preponderance of evidence that a court erred in their judgement.
Sub-section I - The result of appeals cases resulting from criminal cases are themselves, non-appealable and final.Section III - Article III Section III of L.R. 056 shall be amended to read the following:
Section III - In order to file an appeal, a citizen or an individual recently banned due to having been convicted of a crime should post a completed form in the following format to the RMB of the High Court:What decision are you seeking to appeal:Describe how the court in question erred in its decision:
Are you seeking an order to temporarily stop the effects of the decision of the court in question, if so on what grounds:
I personally see nothing wrong with this bill, but would like to know other peoples opinions.
Thank you Chairperson for bringing these amendments.
This act simply brings the JFA into compliance with a recent court ruling on appeals, and clarifies as a matter of statute rather than case law how our appeals process should legally work. It prevents confusion for those just reading the law registry rather than court precedent.
I'm also making an author amendment to the form in section III of the amendments, changing the words "lower court" to "court in question."
We will now begin voting on the bill:
To provide for a better appeals process,
Congress enacts the following:
Section I - Article II Section II Sub-section III shall be amended to read the following:
Sub-section III - Appeals are a proceeding which, if successful, would have the High Court overturn a criminal case decision of any court or a legal review of a lower court if the court in question erred in their judgement.Section II - Article II Section V of L.R. 056 shall be amended to read the following:
Section V - For appeals, the filing citizen or an individual recently banned due to having been convicted of a crime must prove with the preponderance of evidence that a court erred in their judgement.
Sub-section I - The result of appeals cases resulting from criminal cases are themselves, non-appealable and final.Section III - Article III Section III of L.R. 056 shall be amended to read the following:
Section III - In order to file an appeal, a citizen or an individual recently banned due to having been convicted of a crime should post a completed form in the following format to the RMB of the High Court:What decision are you seeking to appeal:Describe how the court in question erred in its decision:
Are you seeking an order to temporarily stop the effects of the decision of the court in question, if so on what grounds:
I vote aye
Aye
Abstain.
I vote Aye
The Judicial Framework Act Amendments has passed the Senate 4-1-2. This will now be sent to the House. 
Santa Marana.
We are now debating the 'Unnecessary Legislation Repeals Act'.
Sponsor: Democratized Peoples
Recognizing that some statutes have outlived or do not have a use,
Congress enacts the following:
Section I - The following acts are repealed, preserving any amendments contained within:
L.R.038 Contractual Obligations Act (2020)
L.R.064 Congressional Internship Act (2022)
Section II - Article VII Section 6 of L.R. 044 is repealed, following sections renumbered accordingly.
I would be thankful if the Author would explain why they believe these two laws should be repealed and provide examples of why.
Thank you Chair for bringing this legislation.
These two pieces of legislation are useless. The first one, the Contractual Obligations Act, has not been used except possibly for one instance a few years ago that others may have more knowledge on than I. But overall, we don't need contract law in Thaecia. It's complicated, it's messy, and it's unnecessary. Better to just get rid of it.
On that note, I have made an author amendment as I needed to get rid of the associated crime. Added in "Section II - Article VII Section 6 of L.R. 044 is repealed, following sections renumbered accordingly."
On the second piece of legislation, it's just completely unnecessary. If we want interns we can just make interns, legislating them is not needed. Mandating weird processes for a job that has no formal power is something that we shouldn't have done, and I'm pretty sure of saying that there has been no benefit from this legislation, and there never will be. Let's get rid of it, and if any of us want interns, hire some interns without an act.
Happy to answer any questions.
I completely disagree with the bill.
Firstly, just because a bill has not been used often, doesn't make it useless.
Secondly, throwing in repealing the internship bill randomly into this bill also doesn't make sense. That bill passed as a bipartisan effort across all parties to create a formalized process to make having an intern legal. We've had this debate many times before, a majority of people agree with having an internship bill. Not to mention, that bill became law very recently, so why try to repeal it now?
I encourage all senators to vote against the bill.
«12. . .269270271272273274275. . .313314»
Advertisement
