by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Ad From Max

Providence: The new novel by Max Barry, creator of NationStates

The South Pacific RMB

WA Delegate: The 🍪 Tropical Biscuit Paradise of Aumeltopia (elected )

Last WA Update:

Board Poll Activity History Admin Rank

World Factbook Entry

🌴 Welcome to the South Pacific ~ Haere mai ki te tonga! 🌴
The oldest democracy in NationStates and the region where the party never ends!

🛡️ Please join the World Assembly and endorse Delegate Aumeltopia, along with all members of the CRS!

⚠️ Find out why this is really important!

👶 New to the South Pacific? Start here!

🏛️ LinkEmbassy Requests🛃 Endorsement Cap🛂 RMB Rules

Embassies: The North Pacific, The East Pacific, the Rejected Realms, 10000 Islands, Spiritus, The Union of Democratic States, Conch Kingdom, Wintreath, The Order of the Grey Wardens, Forest, Hell, Lazarus, NationStates, Albion, Equilism, Gay, and 15 others.Versailles Isle, Knowhere, South Pacific Trading Company, Europe, South Pacific, the West Pacific, the Pacific, PacificCon, Warzone PacificCon, Thalassia, Osiris, The South Pacific WA Voting Center, Eniwhere, Psomewhere Over the Rainbow, and Government Island.

Construction of embassies with Caer Sidi has commenced. Completion expected .

Tags: Anti-Fascist, Casual, Defender, Democratic, Egalitarian, Fantasy Tech, Featured, Feeder, Feminist, Founderless, Future Tech, Gargantuan, and 13 others.General Assembly, LGBT, Map, Modern Tech, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, Outer Space, Regional Government, Role Player, Security Council, Snarky, Social, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: Extremely High

The South Pacific contains 8,320 nations, the 3rd most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Largest Mining Sector in the South Pacific

World Census experts measured the volume of stuff removed from the ground to determine which nations have the largest mining industries.

As a region, the South Pacific is ranked 9,085th in the world for Largest Mining Sector.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The PS2 Puppet of AskatopiaPsychotic Dictatorship“Stop reading my motto!”
2.The Kingdom of DarkmenCorporate Police State“gold or lead”
3.The PANDA of Pencil Sharpeners 2Inoffensive Centrist Democracy“Stop reading my motto!”
4.The Incorporated States of SehlysdreAnarchy“Fiat iustitia et pereat mundus”
5.The Rogue Nation of The Country Without a NameCorporate Police State“The illogically run government”
6.The PS2 Puppet of PterodoriaCompulsory Consumerist State“Stop reading my motto!”
7.The Armed Republic of SprinklerCorporate Police State“To rule and opress”
8.The Desert Hellhole of TremulistanCorporate Police State“Faith sets you free”
9.The Consumption of SkeethCapitalist Paradise“Productivity makes you free. Obey and consume.”
10.The Supreme Holy Empire of Commonwealth Of AstoriaPsychotic Dictatorship“Everyone Can Be Your Friend But only one can love you!”
1234. . .831832»

Regional Poll • LGBT Cinema

The Saucy Suzerain of Auphelia wrote:Over the past two months, I have seen hundreds of hours of LGBT cinematic masterpieces. I have examined them, laughed at them, cried to them, and been incredibly bored by them. From these, I have picked the best of the best through a variety of factors. These are not them. These are the ones that could not make it to the official poll, but ones that are still incredibly good or simply entertaining. Which one do you think is best?

Voting opened 4 hours ago and will close . Open to all nations. You cannot vote as you are not logged in.

Recent polls: “A Question of Ethics”“Eurovision 2020”“Where in the World is Alice Parker?”“Pure Evil”“More Pride”“Pick A Door”

Regional Happenings


The South Pacific Regional Message Board

Amerion wrote:Admittedly, I don't recall watching many films which centres on LGBT issues. The most memorable is Boy Erased.

My favorite was Ticked-Off Trannies With Knives. When the poll was announced by Auphelia I was hopping to see that title.

Demonos wrote:My favorite was Ticked-Off Trannies With Knives. When the poll was announced by Auphelia I was hopping to see that title.


Not very okay...

I haven't seen any of the movies in the poll (because I watch very few movies) but I picked The Half of It just for the Asian LGBT representation haha

Melicorium wrote:Your chances of getting killed by a Major Mitchell's cockatoo are low...,1)/GettyImages-545596762-5aee81c5875db90037634e10.jpg

But never zero.

I’m not opening those links.

Purple Hyacinth wrote:I haven't seen any of the movies in the poll (because I watch very few movies) but I picked The Half of It just for the Asian LGBT representation haha

And it was such a lovely film! I truly felt young again, watching it.

Demonos wrote:My favorite was Ticked-Off Trannies With Knives. When the poll was announced by Auphelia I was hopping to see that title.

Absolutely not. It was exploitative and reductive, even if revenge fantasy films are some of my favourites.

Zess wrote:That’s one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard you say.

I do it for the girls and the gays, that’s it.

(This is how I have always done my polls, but now there is a cute little saying to verbalise it.)

🦉 Office of WA Legislation Notification

The vote and discussion for this new proposal has been opened:

GA: Peaceful First Contact (click to view information)

Discuss and vote on it here: region=the_south_pacific_wa_voting_center


Reminder also that Repeal "Individual Working Freedoms" is still open for OWL voting!


OWL compilation of opinions (no recommendation) on the current GA resolution:



—— —— ——

'Access to Abortion'

Background Information

Proposal title: 'Access to Abortion'
Author: Imperium Anglorum
Purpose: To improve access to abortion using a vast array of means such as state-provided or funded abortions, abortifacients, contraceptives; non-discrimination regulations; WA-funded clinics via WA Choice Plus for members with no-adequate access.


.No Recommendation.

The Office's Analysis
Since this resolution's OWL vote established no majority which is expected for a controversial resolution, OWL views this resolution as something a WA nation should decide for themselves, hence, OWL does not make any recommendation about this proposal and the Delegate will vote along with the majority of WA nations near the end of this resolution's vote. Opinions for and against this resolution will still be provided for nations that wish to use them.

Supplementary Opinions


From TSP Citizens

Nakarisaune is the Prime Minister of the South Pacific.

Nakarisaune wrote:Might as well make sure nations can't technically provide abortions, but make them so hard to access that in practise they aren't practical for many people. Expensive abortions aren't accessible to low-income people who are in most nations probably more likely to require abortions, and far-away clinics aren't practical and, having a large catchment area, are likely to have longer waiting times.

Honeydewistania is a citizen of the South Pacific and a GA author.

Honeydewistania wrote:One of the biggest reasons for abortion is economic reasons. By having poor infrastructure for abortion, it means unsafe abortions will be carried out and could cause death to both the pregnant woman and the unborn child.

Auphelia is a member of the Local Council and a citizen of the South Pacific.

Auphelia wrote:This proposal, while going far in a few places, is vital in preventing nations whose views on abortion are quite negative from instituting de facto pro-life policies in preventing the poor from accessing abortions, a group that also happen to be the most undereducated and most likely to suffer from unwanted pregnancies. It also provides protection to healthcare workers who provide abortions, an important consideration when fear of prosecution can negatively impact the willingness of trained healthcare professionals to provide abortion services. In terms of current abortion protections, I trust the nit picking pedantry of the GA forums to have seen merit in this proposal to negate any ambivalence we may have on that point. Finally, in regard to the expenses mandated, I would argue that the up front costs of providing for abortions is much less than the lifetime burden of having nations use welfare to provide for millions and billions of families who cannot afford to raise children they were unable to abort due to stringent laws. As stated, poorer families are more at risk of unwanted pregnancy, either from poorer education, lack of contraceptive resources, or any number of reasons. Especially in youth, the burden of a child for the unprepared can ruin the chances of a parent from accessing further education or being afforded the vocational opportunities to advance their careers. And if the individual costs of flying their citizens to where abortion clinics are is simply too much, perhaps that is an incentive to build their own, or appeal to the WACC to have clinics built on their land if the up front financial burden of a few buildings is simply too much to bear. I will also note that GA#286 does not address cost in any meaningful way, stating that nations may only add barriers that would be present for procedures of similar complexity . . . which in some nations, could reasonably be determined to mean the price paid for the abortion, assuming that nation has an inadequate healthcare system that fails their poorest citizens. Also, upon reading, it is noted just how vague the protections provided from this six year old proposal are. Any low skilled lawyer could work their way out of or around it in ten minutes. Without exacting standards, nations that do not want to provide abortions will find a way, putting their most vulnerable citizens at risk.

From the World

Saperisole is a citizen of the North Pacific and they posted the following on TNP's WA forum.

Saperisole wrote:This seems like a much improved version of GA #286 and should patch the issues in that legislation that are noted in its attempted repeal.


From TSP Citizens

Tepertopia is a citizen of the South Pacific.

Tepertopia wrote:GA#286 "Reproductive Freedoms" already guarantees an "Access to Abortion", and effectively enough so. The proposal at hand however takes the whole debate one step too far - forcing member states to provide free travel to free abortions makes abortion but a lighthearted ridiculousness, a rash decision made on a whim, where possible recipients are animated to quickly and thoughtlessly abort offspring rather than carefully consider this very emotional and heavy decision.

United States of Vietnam is the Secretary of OWL and a citizen of the South Pacific.

United States of Vietnam wrote:Aside from critical flaws on principles such as requiring states to directly fund abortions and excessive micromanagement like providing free traveling to and funding for WA-run clinics. This proposal seems to not be a good faith effort to improve access to abortion. Looks like it was made solely to spite on the pro-life crowds.

From the World

Auralia is a government official in Catholic and seasoned GA author. They posted the following on the NationStates WA Forum.

Auralia wrote:I believe this proposal is probably legal, though it shouldn't be. No person -- including the proposer -- seriously believes this is an appropriate way to improve abortion access in member states. Most supporters of abortion rights acknowledge that whether to have an abortion is a very serious decision requiring careful consideration. It is very painful for many people. It is absolutely not a subject to make light of, yet that is exactly what this proposal does. It should be apparent to all that this proposal is not an attempt to advance a policy goal in good faith, especially since existing legislation already effectively guarantees abortion access. Rather, this proposal exists to mock fellow players on the opposite side of this issue. The proposer no doubt finds it hilarious to leverage the political power of his faction to pass something completely outrageous, then watch the panicked and ultimately ineffectual reaction.


Read dispatch

When you finally get in the top 10% for Health but you get insanely corrupt while doing so
i've won... but at what cost?

Wow, the only thing I saw on that list was But Im A Cheerleader, and that was a god awful movie with a canyon of plot holes and horrible characters.

Any list without Brojack Horseman loses by default. Forgot the A in LGBT+, and it aint "ally"! Some nations might say EXTREMELY relevant to them! cough

I'm legit surprised auphelia hasn't seen Sabrina on netflix considering it was recently cancelled. I thought the social justice was just too cringe worthy to continue past the 2nd season though. Sabrina aint the time nor the place SJW's.

STD? Even the name is an acronym for a certain kind of disease! Although I'm not a nerd or approve of nerd shows.


I watched some of I am Jazz, but I felt really grossed out about watching it because she was under 18 until the end of the current season.

I'm really glad Stevens Universe didn't make the list though, I hate that audience.

guys how can i boost black market share?

Capitol Hill Occupied Protest wrote:guys how can i boost black market share?

I suppose you could just sink your economy?

Forum View

Ad From Max

Providence: The new novel by Max Barry, creator of NationStates