Post

Husrien wrote:

Hadn't realized you were anti-defender. By default I expect all people to be pro-defender, as that is the moral choice.

Could I maybe get a rundown of what happened? This is the first time I'm hearing of this, and I'd like to be properly educated.

So what? Every non-raider region has a right to exist, no matter the quality of discussion. Different regions have different standards on post quality.

Counter-raiding against raiders is and will always be a good thing. It is war. I am pro-defender because I am anti-raider and support the continued leadership of the native populations of regions.

-it's not the moral choice, you're morally posturing, most defenders are sh*t people
-F7, mostly, and embassy spamming, and low-quality posting, and disliking each other's beliefs, etc
-yes, but when Eclipsis got raided, they reformed into their own region - that's what the repeal was about. every community has the right to exist, but their specific region they had everything saved, so it's not as big of a loss - just a name. Also, this implies you support fascist regions such as Fifth Empire.
-those weren't raider regions, they were leftists. are you anti-leftist now? raiding is a war fendas can't win, and although it is mostly a good thing for regions to exist, if a region gets raided, it's not too hard to reform and pretty quickly get back up to the same size - it took europe maybe a month, a month and a half with 900 nations ejected? it won't take that much for rwot 2 electric boogaloo